The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005. (percentage).
Summarize the information and make comparison where relevant.
The given chart has illustrated about car ownership in the UK in percentage during the period of 1975 and 2005.
It’s noticeable that over the long period, the number of people that have no car had significantly reduced while the figure for those who owned at least one car had slightly risen. It’s also undoubted that the proportion for those who owned one car still the highest out of four group throughout the period.
There was a dramatic fall of nearly 18% in the proportion for those who owned no car between 1975 and 1985. In term of fall, the figure for those who owned one car only also witnessed a drop of 7% during the same period, through unlike the proportions for those who had two and three cars they experienced a moderate increase of 7% and 2%, respectively.
From 1985 to 2005, the number or people who owned no car continued to decrease and finally made it end by hitting a low of 23% at the end of 2005, reducing more 3% from the beginning of the period. In contrary, the proportion for those owned one car, once reduced moderately, had increased, and finally hit the peak of 45%, nearly the same as the beginning of the long period between 1975 and 2005 and still the highest out of for groups. The proportion for those owned two or three cars also increased gradually to finally meet their ends of 9% and 18%, sequentially.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-17 | namphong020 | 85 | view |
| 2021-03-10 | namphong020 | 67 | view |
- Task 1 The table shows the rate of women participating in high ranking excutive in three companies from 1975 to 2015 61
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Figures show that some countries have an increasing proportion of the population who are aged 60 or older What do you think the effects of this may be 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, still, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5306122449 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46216180074 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477551020408 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.723186313 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.75 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.625 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134208925247 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921775437625 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103156775845 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140018777356 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126743092345 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.59 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.