The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph compares how many books had been read between men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. The most significant facts to emerge from the graph are that both the number of books that read by men and women had risen significantly over the period.
From 2011 to 2012, the number of books that read by both men and women increased gradually. Starting at 3500 on 2011, the men’s number of read books has risen gradually by about 500 books, while the figure for women climbed more dramatically and reached over 7000 books on 2012.
There was a dramatic rise in the number of books read by men between the period of 2012 and 2013, while the number of books read by women continued to climb slowly. At the end of 2013, the number of books read by women reached nearly 10500 books, which was the highest peak of the long period between 2011 and 2014. However, the number of books read by women is no longer higher than men’s. Then, between the period of 2013 and 2014, the men’s number of read book continued to rise significantly and finally reached the peak of 15000 books, the highest of the long period, through unlike women’s it fell to a low of about 8000 books, way lower than the figure for men’s.
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the unemployment rate in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- Figures show that some countries have an increasing proportion of the population who are aged 60 or older What do you think the effects of this may be 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50660792952 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09933041356 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444933920705 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5475020129 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.875 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353311401021 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217172545674 0.103423049105 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695458159154 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288545886906 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543586865688 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.