The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region.
Given is the bar chart illustrating the comparison between the regions based on population and global wealth.
It is clear that the largest proportion of global wealth happened in North America. By contrast, the population in Rich Asia-Pacific is the category receiving the least percentage compared to other regions.
In North America, while global wealth is the highest number, at nearly 35%, the figure for the population is significantly lower than in another region, at roughly 6%. The global population percentage in China occupied the most, at nearly 25%, however, China and other Asia Pacific's wealth have the same number, at about 4%. Meanwhile, approximately 16% is the percentage of the population for both region, other Asia Pacific, and India.
By and large, Europe is the region having a relatively high about population and distribution of wealth, at 15% and 30% respectively. At the same time, Africa, Latin America & Caribbean, and Rich Asia-Pacific have a mere minority number of population, at under 10%. A noticeable fact is that the quantity of global wealth in India, Africa, and Latin America & Caribbean are under 5%, in stark contrast, there is a high of wealth in Rich Asia-Pacific, at about 26%
- The table below shows the percentages of people joining in seven different sports in a European country from 1999 to 2009. 89
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary (Yen) from 1953 to 1983, and the prices of black and white television and colour television during the same period. 80
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK. 11
- Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- Scientists and engineers are continuing to look for new ways to generate electricity The following is a diagram of how electricity may be generated from tidal flow Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20707070707 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91992722512 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3251230508 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.555555556 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317815285893 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156106072145 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815415048079 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219056842065 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549233771082 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.