The bar graph below shows the number of television receivers per 1000 inhabitants in the world in 1970 and 1997.
Given is the graph illustrating the quantity of television sets researching in 1000 individuals around the world between 1970 and 1997.
It is clear that the number of televisions continued a stable climb with slight acceleration during the period. Remarkably, there was a large rate in developed countries.
To embark on, the ownership of TV receivers in the world in 1997 was 200% (three times) higher than in 1970 at 81. Least developed countries were negatively correlated with a mere minority of idiot boxes in both years, at 0.5 and 23 respectively.
In the developing countries, standing at only 9.9 in 1970, there was appreciable acceleration to 157 after 27 years. Meanwhile, although the rate began at higher point than other areas, (263) it jumped further to 548 in 1997.
- The chart below shows average hours and minutes spent by UK males and females on different daily activities. 84
- The chart shows the number of visitors to a local cinema according to age in 2000 57
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and state your opinion. 73
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary (Yen) from 1953 to 1983, and the prices of black and white television and colour television during the same period. 80
- The news media have become too much influence in people lives today and this is a negative development To what exent do you agree or disagree 48
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 660.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 130.0 196.424390244 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.37664837539 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92716313581 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.684615384615 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 185.4 283.868780488 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.3814857858 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.2857142857 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20648115694 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888302833285 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972005679351 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130896185452 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930419764495 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.