The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given.
Given is the line graph revealing the percentage of people in every age group went to the cinema in the UK from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, the trend of going to the cinema in each age group increased gradually over the research time. At the same time, the rate of people aged 44-54 enjoyed attending to the cinema was always highest.
As can be seen, people who were 14-24 was the category receiving the least expenditure during 1990 to 2010. To be specific, the proportion stood under 20% in 1990 and fluctuated to 20% in 2005. The figure for this age group rose slightly about 21% in 2010. Meanwhile, the percentage of cinema attendance of 24-34-year-olds was under 30% until 2005 and experienced a slightly acceleration to over 30% in 2010.
A noteable fact is that the quantity of people in the 34-44 and 44-54 age group was likely to stand at 39% in the first year. For the next 15 years, both figures were subject to overall volatility under 50% and the figure for 44-54-year-old people hit the highest point at about 50% in 2010.
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 92
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006. 60
- The graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year. 61
- The plans below show a school library five years ago and the same library now. 73
- It is said that people's life now is becoming more and more stressful. What are the causes and how to solve it? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('acceleration') instead of another adjective.
...as under 30% until 2005 and experienced a slightly acceleration to over 30% in 2010. A noteable fact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62903225806 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54650922145 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0928603977 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.098861024362 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470484019347 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531271753977 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806536640107 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596907181404 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.