The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the bar chart illustrating the proportion of the Canadians using social networks in 2014 and 2015. In general, the majority of people used one sites; however, there was an increasing number of those utilizing more than one.
Evidently, the figure for one-site users in 2014 was 36% but the year 2015 witnessed a considerable decrease of 8% even though it remained the highest of all. Having a similar downward trend was the number of citizens who had never used any social networking sites, accounting for one-fifth of the population.
Ranking second is the quantity of Canadian people having accounts on two sites when one out of four admitted bearing this habit. Another noticeable point is that multiple SNS users rose dramatically, especially those having three or four sites. The figures for these categories were 4 and 3 percent respectively. A slight change can be seen in two-site and five-site users with just a growth of 1 and 2 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Shivam7090 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Sagar Gurung | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | phanduydat | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
- Nuclear power is a necessary evil Despite the potential human and environmental consequences of radioactive fall out nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non renewable energy source Do you agree or disagree 90
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.There is growing evidence that man-made activities are making global temperatures higher.What might be the man-made causes of temperatures rising? How should we deal with this problem?Give reasons for your an 84
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people say that the teaching method with a teacher and students in a classroom will not exist by the year 2050.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the infomation by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96894409938 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75303158389 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.714285714286 0.547539520022 130% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1336391772 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159338516419 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716746652913 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065848637877 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119556272509 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575835632152 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.