The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of people holding science qualifications in Malaysia and Singapore.
Overall, as can be seen, people who hold no science qualifications account for the largest rate in both countries. Another visible trend is that people who have master’s degree have an equal percentage in two nations.
In terms of a significantly low proportion, the students holding master level in science in both Malaysia and Singapore account for approximately 4%. Likewise, the percentage of people hold Bachelor’s degree in Malaysia is about 10% in science. The figure for Singapore is higher, at around 20%.
By contrast, in Malaysia, the rate of people who hold the science qualifications with school leaving exams is slightly higher compared to Singapore, at almost 36% and 30% respectively. The figure for people holding no science qualifications at all in Malaysia is under 65%, whereas the number in Singapore is about 5% lower.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-08 | Thao Anh194 | 76 | view |
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- In some societies the responsibility of mother differs from the responsibility of father What is the reason for this And what do u think of the parental issues in the future 91
- In some countries governments pay the money for students university fees while in other countries students pay for themselves Do advantages of governments paying for the students outweigh its disadvantages 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams by subject and gender during the period 2010 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39735099338 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23893195874 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562913907285 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0396746746 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14829273926 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765002222692 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047706618334 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110412079525 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372623330782 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.