The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Submitted by umerkhani on Fri, 03/02/2018 - 03:18

The bar chart shows the situation of people’s science qualifications in both Malaysia and Singapore, people in these countries will be categories into 4 levels.

There is a same percentage of master’s degree of science in two countries, slightly higher than 3%. But the percentage of having a bachelor degree in science field of Singapore is doubled than Malaysia(20% for Singapore and 10% for Malaysia). The numbers of passing school leaving exams and no qualification in science do not have a significant difference between two countries. Singapore has 60% people qualified in science and 30% passed the school leaving exams. Malaysia has more 5% than Singapore in these two parts, 65% and 35% respectively. Ostensible, In lower lever of science Malaysia has more qualifiers than Singapore, whereas Singapore has more intellectuals in science field. After all, both of these countries are still competitive with each other, there is no a country has a overwhelming advantage in this field.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-09 Kien Vu 56 view
2020-01-09 Kien Vu 56 view
2020-01-09 Kien Vu 56 view
2019-10-10 Garrett 56 view
2019-08-06 raminghorbanii 67 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user umerkhani :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 777, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...l competitive with each other, there is no a country has a overwhelming advantage ...
^^
Line 3, column 794, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...h each other, there is no a country has a overwhelming advantage in this field.
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, still, whereas, after all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34810126582 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15078649483 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9840914628 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.625 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136174868684 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679129208552 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452259367749 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12051163561 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112841192887 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.