The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the information of various science degree were possessed by each individual from Malaysia and Singapore in percentage.
According to the graph, 65% and 60% of people do not have any qualification of science in Malaysia and Singapore respectively. Similarly, in those two countries, 35% and 30% of individual passed school leaving exams. Though, 3% of people from each country held master’s degree, people of Singapore are highly interested for bachelor’s degree compare to Malaysia’s countrymen. It is observed that 20% individual from Singapore and 10% countrymen from Malaysia possessed bachelor’s degree certificate.
Overall, both countrymen acquired master’s degree knowledge equally. On the other hand, twice number of people of Singapore held bachelor’s degree certificate than Malaysia’s countrymen. In case of School level science education both countrymen almost equally possessed elementary level science knowledge. Similarly, equal percentage of people in each country, have not had any science education.
- Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- he chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words 73
- You organized a party for a 90th birthday party in a hotel for a relative; many elderly guests attended this party which is of great success.Write a letter to thank the hotel manager. In your lettergive the details of the partythe reason why the party was 73
- Diagram about the production of deep fried salted peanuts 64
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.18543046358 4.92477711251 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46348118847 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582781456954 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0440278811 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114575398829 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547214176194 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322760046786 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866840357594 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00609441798236 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 61.2550243902 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.33 11.4140731707 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.