The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The bar chart reveals the amount of donation among people of different ages in Britian for the year 1990 and 2020.
To begin with, it is clearly seen that the 36-35 age -group had shown highest contribution for charity in year 1990 was 42%. The figure showd least proportion for 18-25 age group was only 17%. Above 50s age group people had shown decline trend and reached at 32%.
Moving further, there was only 7% contribution for 18-25age group in second year which was minimal as compare to initial year range.But this figure showed slightly increased and arrived at 39% for 51-65 age group. But at the last it was again folloe decreasing trend and arrived at 35%. In stark contrast, this second year participation for donation much less for earlier ages as compare to 1990 year charity rate.
Overall, it is the evident from graph in initial year donation range was much higher as compare to second year. However, the pattern is different before and after the age 50s.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | exdiscipulus | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | manaswi.ielts | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | azizkhon | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Zuna-ira | 67 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport . 56
- The older generation tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live, think and behave. However, some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generation for modern life.To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the quantiies of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 84
- The diagram below shows information about quartely profit for three companies of united states from 2005 to 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'shown the highest'.
Suggestion: shown the highest
...arly seen that the 36-35 age -group had shown highest contribution for charity in year 1990 w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'showd the least'.
Suggestion: showd the least
...harity in year 1990 was 42%. The figure showd least proportion for 18-25 age group was only...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...inimal as compare to initial year range.But this figure showed slightly increased ...
^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s compare to initial year range.But this figure showed slightly increased and arr...
^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Overall, it is the evident from graph in initial year donation range was much ...
^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ial year donation range was much higher as compare to second year. However, the pa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77647058824 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22986957894 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1442133612 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239489257321 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11328608731 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742124947538 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167682166102 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444036378578 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.