The chart below gives information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range foe years 1990 and 2010.
The bar graph exhibits that the information about donated money to Charity by the Britisher in different is groups during the two years.
Overall, it can be incurred that the high amount of fund gave the charity in first year by young and others people than old masses whereas, in next year this trend opposite.
Primarily, it is vividly apparent that in 1990, 42% of 36-50 age group made charitable donations and, it was the highest ratio. But, this ratio was reached at 35% in 2010. The age group of youngsters gave the money to charity more than fifth in 1990 and this percentage was very minor in 2010. The level of donation of 26-35 age group was decline 7% in 2010 as compared to 1990 it was 31%.
Furthermore, 51-65 age group and more than this had minor donation different with each other. In the for more case, it was 35% in 1990 and 39% in 2010 respectively. In the latter case, percent of this donation was more than thirty in 2010 which is higher than 3% in 1990
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-10 | Mandeep kaur khalsa | 56 | view |
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime but some people believe that these measure restrictions our individual freedom. 56
- Tourism has negative impact on certain destinations some people believe that particular tourists are to be blamed for that discuss the specific negative impact I your country and suggest solutions 78
- Illiteracy has traditionally been viewed as largely a third world problem. However it is becoming apparent that in countries such as the USA and Australia illiteracy is on the increase. Discuss possible causes for this and its effect on society 61
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only government and big companies can make a difference to what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in order to reduce crime but some people believe that these measure restricts our individual freedom. This device has advantage outweigh of disadvantages. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 2010 respectively. In the latter case, percent of this donation was more than t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45555555556 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26225060013 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8993792718 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1111111111 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202498000161 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955480226549 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540323385052 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124764840237 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325174529162 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.