The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by range age for the years 1990 and 2010
The given bar chart illustrates information about how many British people in different ages giving money to charity in 1990 and in 2010 and it measured in percentage of people. Overall, it can be seen that the percentage of people, who aged between 36 or 50 and gave money to charity was in a great extent in 1990 and it was at least possible amount for 18-25 years old people.
First of all, the enrolment of people, who is allocate money on charity, increase gradually, when people getting older. Thus, while the percentage of 18-25 aged individuals was over the 15% and 5% in 1990 and 2010 respectively, it was over 40 and exactly 35% for 36-50 age people. Moreover, after 50 years old British people are less enthusiastic to assist other in 1990 and the trend was 32% approximately over 65 age. By contrast, the proportion of people, who invest money on charity, raise till 65 years old and reached at under 40 in 2010. But only 35 % of over 65 years old people gave money in order to assist others in 2010
- In recent years, many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people. Why is the case? What can be done to attract local people 67
- Children's education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some some or all costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 73
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 56
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 61
- The graph and table show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'allocated'.
Suggestion: allocated
...of all, the enrolment of people, who is allocate money on charity, increase gradually, w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...5% and 5% in 1990 and 2010 respectively, it was over 40 and exactly 35% for 36-50...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, thus, while, at least, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50543478261 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50399242934 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6003898167 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3720244193 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182308640425 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125669204041 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322778282563 0.15604864568 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092273030222 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.