The chart below show the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city center from 2003 to 2012.
The given chart illustrates how three types of crime in Manchester city centre changed between 2003 and 2012. Overall, it is clear that the number of burglaries decreased significantly while that of car thefts experienced a minimal rise over the given period. It can also be noticed that the number of robberies remained stable throughout 9 years.
At the beginning of the period, Burglary stood at nearly 3500 then increased slightly and reached its peak at about 3800 in 2004. This figure then went through a substantial decline over the next 4 years and hit its lowest point at just above 1000 in 2008. In the meantime, the number of car thefts showed an downward trend and bottomed out at 2000 in 2006 while robbery peaked at roughly 1000 in 2005 before dropping to 500 in 2008.
After 2008, the number of burglaries rose slightly to about 1400 at the end of the period. Meanwhile, robbery recovered to its starting point at over 500 in 2012 after some small fluctuations and car theft increased remarkably by nearly 1500 and finished at about 2800.
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Countries should try to produce all the food for the population and import as little food as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve road safety would be to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The chart below show the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city center from 2003 to 2012 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...antime, the number of car thefts showed an downward trend and bottomed out at 2000...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8306010929 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50947620258 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617486338798 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9507207812 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0959875586654 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057191597626 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131203807344 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796082002898 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883117027052 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.