The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
The given bar chart compares the expenditure of France and the UK on six different types of consumer goods in 2010.
Overall, in the given period, the UK spent more on consumer goods than the France in three of five categories, which were cars, books and cameras. Both countries spent most of their money on cars whereas the least amount of money was spent on perfume in the UK compared to cameras in the France. Furthermore, the most significant difference in expenditure between two countries was on cameras.
In the UK, expenditure on cars was £450,000 compared to £400,000 in the France. Similarly, people in the UK spent more on books as opposed to French (about £400,000 and £300,000 respectively). In terms of cameras, British expenditure was over double that of their counterpart, which was £150,000.
On the other hand, the amount of money paid out on the remaining goods was higher in France. Expenditure in France was above £350,000, nearly similar with the UK at exact £350,000. Finally, around £200,000 was spent by the French on perfume, slightly higher than the British people at £150,000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 89
- The diagrams show how the bee makes honey and the stages in the production of honey Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and making comparisons where relevant 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, similarly, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02688172043 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75401618671 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.459030733 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.5 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163568041186 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810904051529 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903390716777 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136423176964 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107269157095 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.