The graph below presents how much money two countries are spending on customer products in 2010.
Looking at the graph it is clearly obvious that cars were the field that both of these countries paid the most attention on, with the amount of money exceeding 400000 pounds, while in contrast perfume grabbed the lowest care, with just below 200000 pounds for both countries.
France and UK all had their own advantages in some goods. France was good at paying money on perfume and computers. However, the differences weren't too deep compared to UK (the highest difference was just over 50000 pounds). While UK had a strong point in cars, books and cameras. UK had the highest number of the figure in cars with 450000 pounds. They also owned the highest difference with France in cameras (over 200000 pounds). On the contrary, UK also had the lowest record of the graph in perfume (below 150000 pounds). Therefore, we can see that UK had a higher bandwidth of money in comparison with France.
In conclusion, it is easy to see that although the money varied greatly between both countries, the number was still very high with the lowest one of just below 150000 pounds.
- Some people argue that the fittest and strongest individuals and teams can achieve the greatest success in sports But other people think the success is much related to the mental attitude Discuss both views and give your opinion 44
- The chart below shows Morocco s income from different economic sectors in 2003 as well as its income from fishing from 1982 to 2003 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the charts below 78
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 61
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 56
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...and computers. However, the differences werent too deep compared to UK the highest dif...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lowest one of just below 150000 pounds.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80693069307 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29192951204 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544554455446 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.8783424592 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2727272727 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940089162952 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412408457239 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682006694286 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908693929633 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875752687617 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.