The bar chart compares the amount of money spent on five consumer goods (cars, computers, books, perfume and cameras) in France and the UK in 2010. Units are measured in pounds sterling.
Looking at the chart, it is clear that the UK spent more money on consumer goods than France. Both the British and the French spent most of their money on cars, whereas the least amount of money was spent on perfume in France compared to cameras in the UK. Overall, the most significant difference in expenditure between the two countries was on cameras.
In terms of cars, the UK spent about 450000 pounds on this, while the figure for France was slightly lower, at 400000 pounds. Similarly, the British spent more money on books than the French (about 400000 and 300000 pounds respectively). In the UK, expenditure on cameras (just over 350000 pounds) was double that of in France (about 150000 pounds).
On the other hand, France spent more money on the remaining goods than the UK. Above 350000 pounds was spent by the French on computers, which was modestly more than the British who spent exactly 350000 pounds. Neither of the two countries spent more money on perfume, which made up about 200000 pounds in France, but under 150000 pounds in the UK.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, similarly, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76388888889 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21173741828 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435185185185 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.010892267 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5454545455 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132106958986 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677325061031 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773824169808 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105787059392 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660378872994 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.48 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.