The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The chart below illustrate how often people in the United State visited fast food restaurants from 2003 to 2013. It can be clearly seen from the chart that the percentage of people who ate in fast food restaurants once a week and once or twice a month is the largest in this period of time.
According to the chart, the proportion of USA resident who came to fast food restaurant weekly basis stood at just over 30 percent in 2003 then increased slightly in 2006 before dropped to approximately 27 percent. In addition, the percentage of fast food restaurant customer visited one or two time per month declined sharply from one third to a quarter between 2003 and 2006 before rose sharply to above 30 percent in 2013.
By contrast, the proportion of people who never ate and ate every day in fast food restaurants decreased during this period of time and always under 5 percent. Meanwhile, from 2003 to 2013 saw an significant rise in the percentage of customer ate few time a year from about 13 percent to 15 percent. Finally, the percentage fast food restaurants visitor ate several times per week went up from above of 15 percent to 20% between 2003 and 2006 before falling to 15 percent again 7 years later.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different citid s between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not to go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. Summarise the information. 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...or twice a month is the largest in this period of time. According to the chart, the proport...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... food restaurants decreased during this period of time and always under 5 percent. Meanwhile, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...rcent. Meanwhile, from 2003 to 2013 saw an significant rise in the percentage of c...
^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
... rise in the percentage of customer ate few time a year from about 13 percent to 15 perc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63888888889 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52740466653 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509259259259 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.8278565496 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.142857143 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8571428571 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378788552721 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209875214037 0.103423049105 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105684193663 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28672190367 0.15604864568 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841500794436 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.