The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart compares the percentage of six different time’s groups of people who eat fast food in the United States in 2003, 2006, and 2013.
It is obvious that, the American people have tendency to at fast food once a week in 2006 by more than 32 percent, while the percentage of people have eat fast food once or twice a month has same percent in 2013.
As can be seen, people who at fast food everyday reduce after 2003, and did not change in 2006 and 2013. Although after 2003 people showed that like to eat fast food in several times a week in 2006, there was a decrease about 4 percent in 2013. The maximum percent of frequency of people at fast food has in once a week group, where after a slight increase with 33 percent in 2006 drop approximately 9 percent in 2013. In once or twice a month group people did not like to eat fast food in 2006 and fell about 5 percent, but it increase in 2013. In last two groups there were not much change, the people who have never eaten fast food reduce in 2006 and did not change in 2013, while it is true about A few times a year vise versa.
- the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 56
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
...nt, while the percentage of people have eat fast food once or twice a month has sam...
^^^
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...As can be seen, people who at fast food everyday reduce after 2003, and did not change i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...n 2006 and fell about 5 percent, but it increase in 2013. In last two groups there were ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.1455399061 4.92477711251 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.02573319214 2.65546596893 76% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455399061033 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.4164175346 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.142857143 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273681058693 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176784557187 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467176401665 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216721836942 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304299417297 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.87 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.38 11.4140731707 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.38 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 17.0 40.7170731707 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.