The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graphs give some information about the percentage of households in three distinct groups and the number of hours per week between 1920 and 2019.
It is obvious that, refrigerator has most increased among all categories and tow remains have upward trend throughout the period, while the number of hours per week has decreased during 1920 and 2019.
As can be seen, washing machines were most common groups among people by 40% in 1920. It fluctuated but throughout has upward trend by reaching more than 72% in 2019 with just only a small drip in 1980. Despite raise steady in vacuum cleaner it did not reach 100% until 2000.
Refrigerator has nearly 1% in 1920 but its amazing growth sharply that could reach 100% I 1980. The ownerships would like to consume this instrument more than others.
There was a slight decrease in hours per week along the period from 1920 to 2019 about 40% form 50% in 1980.
As a result, the refrigerator has most common group among all others which people consume it more than others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-13 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | oanhlilies | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The working week should be shorter and workers should have longer weekend Do you agree or disagree 73
- the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
- The plans below show a harbor in 2000 and how it looks today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people believe that it is beast to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these view and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
... categories and tow remains have upward trend throughout the period, while the number...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...It fluctuated but throughout has upward trend by reaching more than 72% in 2019 with ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75418994413 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31400937083 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614525139665 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2186022881 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5555555556 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0896770464929 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385349020521 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369855653627 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0509497045481 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401521068902 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.