The chart below show the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000 and 2010, with projected sales for 2020.
The bar chart compares five different nations in terms of how many journals were bought by each person in two the year 2000 and 2010, with projections for 2020.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that the number of magazines sold per person in the country D increases, while the opposite was true for the other nations. Additionally, the figures for area B is the largest over the period shown, as opposed to the lowest number which can be seen in sector E.
In 2000, nearly 50 magazines purchased by per individual in territory B was the highest, followed by A and C with just under 50 units and 40 units respectively. By contrast, there were only approximately 20 journals purchased by a resident in region D, compared to only about 6 magazines inland E. In 2010, the quantities of magazines in the country A, B and C also fell slightly, whereas the data for the other area rose insignificantly.
Over the decade ensuing, the number of journals in the country D is predicted that climb trivial by around 2 units. Meanwhile, a downward trend is prophesied happening in the remaining four nations, however, the tallest decrease is guessed appearing in country A about 6 journals, whilst the reduction of about 1 each for the subsisting three areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-24 | TranMinhDuc | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-23 | Narges.s | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-29 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-28 | hin07 | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-18 | tda | 71 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 95
- The chart below shows a comparison of di erent kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 73
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75454545455 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85214143124 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.3204141631 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.75 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35840731767 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130399231212 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919826409011 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194627170497 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800417939213 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75454545455 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85214143124 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.3204141631 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.75 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35840731767 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130399231212 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919826409011 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194627170497 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800417939213 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.