The chart below show percentage of total water used five different sectors in Sydney, Australia in 1997 and 2007.
The pie charts compare the percentage of total water used five different sectors in Sydney, Australia between 1997 and 2007.
Total water consumption used for food industry accounted for the highest percentage in both 1997 and 2007. The proportion of water consumed for both household use and service industry increased dramatically from 1997 to 2007.
In 1997, the percentage of water used for food industry was just a half of total water consumption, followed by water consumption of building industry, accounting for only 5%. The proportion of water consumed for household use stood at under a fifth. Similarly, the figures for water consumption of service industry and manufacturing were 13% and 15% respectively, which was roughly equal.
By 2007, the percentage of water used for the service industry experienced a significant growth to 26%, surpassing the household use 21% to rank second. After a decade, despite a marginal drop of 7%, the food industry still dominated other sectors. Meanwhile, the figures for manufacturing and building industry was a slight decline, at 11% and 2% respectively
- The chart below show percentages of water used in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007
- The chart below show percentage of total water used five different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 67
- The maps show a beachfront in Australia in 1950 and today 84
- In this day and age children doing part time jobs have been becoming one of the most significant issues to be encouraged by their parents Do the advantages of this outweigh the isavantages
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, similarly, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36571428571 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98045880594 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497142857143 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6593444568 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351982632847 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184943874623 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.205675710458 0.0843802449381 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31086534815 0.15604864568 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.235741250143 0.0819641961636 288% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, similarly, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36571428571 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98045880594 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497142857143 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6593444568 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351982632847 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184943874623 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.205675710458 0.0843802449381 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31086534815 0.15604864568 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.235741250143 0.0819641961636 288% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.