The given charts illustrate the percentage of travelers choosing four different kinds of accommodations in three different years namely 1988, 1998, 2008.
Overall, it is evident that the allocation of the option of choosing to stay with family members and friends witnessed a moderate fall, while there was an upward trend of selecting rented apartments. The percentage of people who opted for share accommodation with family and buddies was the highest during three different years.
In 1988, the choice of renting apartments to stay accounted for 7%, after which this figure significantly increased to 22% in 2008. This growth was similar to the proportion of holidaymakers choosing hotels option, which was 15% in 1988, after which point this number gradually rose by 7% in 1998 and stayed unchanged in 2008.
In terms of camping, the percentage of travelers who chose this selection made up over one-fourth in 1988, followed by a considerable fall to 22% in 2008. And this figure continued to decrease in 2008, at 12%. This downward trend was the same as the option of staying with family members and friends, which reached the highest peak in 1988, at 52%. After that, there were a marginal decrease in 1998 and a sharp fall in 2008 in this option, at 54% and 44% respectively.
- The chart below show the proportion of holidaymakers using three diffrent types of in three diffrent years 56
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 73
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits Why How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport 73
- Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer Do you agree or disagree 56
- Many countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98139534884 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73949145147 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539534883721 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5155053386 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0601636848279 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0279068240477 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447357882984 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0522974635587 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496755149405 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.