The chart below shows the amount of money given to developing countries from five organisations from 2008 to 2011.
The bar chart illustrates how much money was provided by five different organizations to developing countries between 2008 and 2011.
Organization 2 witnessed a significant increase in financial allocation throughout the period; the opposite trend was true for Organisations 4 and 5. Meanwhile, organization 3 remained the most significant contributor during the first 2 years.
In 2008, organization 1 stood at around 0.6 billion dollars, followed by organizations 4 and 5, which allocated around 0.7 billion dollars and 1.3 billion dollars. Following 3 years, organization 1 rose dramatically to 0.7 billion dollars, while those from organization 4 and 5 took the opposite direction, at 0.4 billion dollars and 0.5 billion dollars, respectively.
In addition, the amount of money provided by Organisation 2 started at 1.3 billion dollars in 2008 before increasing to 1.5 billion dollars in the next year. In the same period, the largest funding came from Organization 3, amounting to 1.5 billion dollars in 2008 and 1.7 billion dollars in 2009. At the end of the period, organization 2 registered a sharp growth to an unprecedented 2.6 billion dollars in financial allocation; in contrast, the figure for organization 3 backed to their first point in 2011.
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- The charts below give information on the location and types of dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- All university students should do some voluntary work to help the local community To what do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below illustrates the percentages of sales of one bookseller in 1970 1997 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37373737374 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32320162093 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540404040404 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8154994381 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158620206711 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854545754351 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877901194472 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120843764493 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102138397378 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.