The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The bar chart illustrates, the national expenditure of fast food for three different groups in a week by the year of 1990 in UK. While, line graph illustrates, consumption of these items from 1970 to 1990. Units are measured in pence per person and in grams.
Overall, the amount of money spent for Hamburger was the top level in high and average income groups. Whereas, pizza was the least fast food consumed by average and lower income groups. Furthermore, pizza was most significant item in UK over the period given.
The number of people spent money for Hamburger was 45 pence per person in high income groups, while low income groups consumed mere 14 pence. Fish and chips makes up average groups up to 25 pence which is exceeded than high and low groups with just over 15 pence. In addition, the data of average groups expense for hamburger was over 30 pence.
With regards to the pizza less than 20 pence spent for all category instead of that high income was highest with 18 pence over the given period.
As is observed in line graph, consumption of pizza was the peak level with 300 grams in 1970, then there was gradual decrease in over 15 years and stay almost stable with 200 grams by 1990. The account for fish, chips and hamburger remained steadily in first five years with lower than 100 grams. There were a rapid increase in fish and chips reached 500 grams after 20 years which is 200 grams higher than the amount of hamburger which is 300 grams in 1990 after a dramatic growth from 1985 with 100 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | gulbakhyt_90 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Bao Linh Le | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | khaled94 | 11 | view |
| 2018-11-20 | Metallica | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-17 | Canmed | 67 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 84
- The map below shows the changes in an American town between 1948 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.» Write at least 150 words. 78
- Many individuals prefer to talk online with their peers than going with individuals in surrounding networks do you think the benefis exceed the odds 61
- Nowadays many business meetings and training are happening online and not in real offices. Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages in this matter? 89
- The graph below shows the changes in the place where people used to surf the internet in the years 1998 2000 2002 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hermore, pizza was most significant item in UK over the period given. The numb...
^^
Line 6, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pence spent for all category instead of that high income was highest with 18 pen...
^^
Line 8, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...adual decrease in over 15 years and stay almost stable with 200 grams by 1990. Th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, then, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 274.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58759124088 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15979777076 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481751824818 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8218036545 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6923076923 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112162179777 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518639037175 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453550415058 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0754463675977 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482140269411 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.