The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15-year-olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK.
The supplied bar chart compares the amount of time spent on two activities (namely chatting online and playing computer games) by children between the ages of 10 and 15 in England.
Overall, it is evident from the information that playing games is a more popular option among the aforementioned group. In addition, while chatting is more favored by girls, games seem to be a preferred option to many boys.
Looking at the information in more detail, around 85% of boys aged 10 to 15 in the UK admit playing computer games every day, compared to roughly 55% of those who conserve online. Specifically, a majority of boys play video games console for more than one hour every day, and approximately 10% of them spend at least four hours per day doing so. With regard to chatting, slightly over a quarter of boys chat for less than one hour.
10 to 15-year-old girls, on the other hand, tend to favor chatting over playing computer games. Just below 70% of girls are reported to involve themselves in online communication, whilst the figure for those playing games stands at marginally above 50%. As regards chatting on the Internet, most girls spend between 1 and 3 hours, and games, on the contrary, are mostly played for less than an hour. Finally, just 5% of girls respond to playing games for over 4 hours per day.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-10 | Daniel3003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Pham Ngoc Anh | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | Trần Khánh Nhi | 78 | view |
- The table shows the amount of money given to developing countries by the USA EU countries and other countries from 2006 to 2010 Figures are in millions of dollars 84
- Writing task 2 You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Trying to save endangered animal species from extinction is a waste of valuable resources Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any r 89
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 84
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people say that with the considerable benefits computers and internet bring about they can completely replace the traditional role of a teacher Do you agree or disagree with it 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, so, while, as regards, at least, in addition, on the contrary, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70562770563 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54508640622 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588744588745 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.282167319 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.7 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342180404398 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130737528715 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662156598705 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194223713341 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649156703562 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.