The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15-year-olds spending chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK,
The bar chart illustrates the figure for time on each school day for chatting on the Internet and playing games of teenagers aged from 10 to 15 years old in the UK.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of time which youngsters between the age of 10 and 15 years old spent playing on games console dominated this figure they spent chatting on the Internet. However, there were different trends for boys and girls in the term of these purposes.
Looking at the figure for chatting on the Internet, boys of the age from 10 to 15 years old spent much less time on this activity than their counterparts, represented at 55% and approximately 70% respectively. For more details, the male people in this age group who spent time chatting more than an hour on an average school day were in the majority, at around 50%.
By contrast, the percentage of 10-15 year old boys playing on games was around 85% which saw a significant decrease in this of girls in the same age participating in this activity, reached at 50%. In both genders, spending less than one hour per school day for games was in the minority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-09 | Bao Trang | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | Nhu Quynh Pham | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | Nhu Quynh Pham | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services. 67
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish. 61
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart illustrates the proportion of males and females living in a province and using bicycles in 5 different age groups in 2011. 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59296482412 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57504226285 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497487437186 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.5578420147 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.571428571 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393837398269 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192012817629 0.103423049105 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123796648822 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273300221467 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890145780284 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.