The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery.
The maps describe the way in which a floor of an art gallery would develop.
Overall, it is clear that the floor witnesses significant changes to become more modern and have more spacious space for exhibition.
For the exhibition space, there rooms of permanent and temporary spaces are converted into the integrated room which would be a large permanent exhibition space in the proposed floor plan. In this new exhibition area, a new entrance which could lead to the parking court appears. In addition, it can be seen that the special exhibition space and the store of displaying would be constructed in comparison with the existing plan.
Looking at the change of spaces near the old entrance, the lobby and office would be demolished to make way for an education area and a store. There would be also no the entrance in this place in the suggested plan. Many changes appear although the total size of the space stays unchanged.
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 61
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services. 61
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... area and a store. There would be also no the entrance in this place in the sugge...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85625 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56368874866 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56875 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7338925221 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.125 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167191187983 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720196203678 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531030509213 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108675057031 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037382234785 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.