The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000.
The presented graph outlines the average lowest and the highest level of two air pollutants in four major cities in 2000. The spectacular feature of the chart is an availability of excessive pollution in Mexico.
As can be observed from the chart, the prevalence of Sulphur dioxide in an environment in Los Angeles hit a trough in minimum level while it upsurged to level of 40 in a day. However, the Dinitrous oxide was present in the environment comparatively fourfolds. Moreover, in Calcutta, there was not much difference in the maximum and minimum levels of pollution which was 12% and 22% in case of SO2 and N2O respectively.
Moving further, levels of SO2 and N2O in the air was just 25% and 14% while the former became fivefold of a minimum level. It is surprising to note that, the amount of pollutant in the Mexico was at its highest even at a minimum level which was 80 and 113 for SO2 and N2O respectively.
Overall, the burgeoning rate of Sulphur dioxide was very speedy as contrasted to the other kinds of pollutants.
- Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem. What causes of the increased demand, and what measures can governments and individuals take to respond to th 84
- It is said that "Not everything that is learned is contained in books".Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why? 61
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to in 2000 and 2010. 93
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years 70
- The graph and bar chart below show the average monthly rainfall and temperature for one region of East Africa 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71978021978 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82569869575 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554945054945 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6264821787 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27768389083 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121364844696 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112391411653 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165021165398 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130997263886 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.