The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005.
The given chart compares the proportion of various energy sources in France over the 10-year period from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, during the examined period, the percentage of energy produced from coal remained the major occupation. Additionally, except for the significant drop in terms of the figure for energy generated from petro, the rate of the remaining energy categories witnessed a marginal increase.
In 1995, the energy produced from coal accounted for the highest proportion, at 29.80%, followed by those from gas and petro which were slightly lower, at 29.63% and 29.27% respectively. By contrast, 6.4% is the figure for nuclear, whereas other sources just made up only 4.9% of total production.
Regarding the year 2005, with the slowly growths of about 1%, the energy created from coal still maintained the highest percentage. Moreover, while a dramatic decline of roughly 10% was witnessed in the figure for petro, there were considerable rises by approximately 5% in its counterparts for nuclear and other sources. Meanwhile, the rate of energy generated from gas went up moderately to 30.31%.
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005. 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, still, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36931818182 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78206675026 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5808809516 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.125 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135169302576 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682451427834 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723746707219 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108146982716 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797001312896 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.