The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in the UK and the proportion of men and women who held them in 2008
The chart represents the proportion of different educational levels for post-school qualifications in the UK between genders in 2008.
Overall, as the level of education was higher, the proportion of male holders increased. Also, it is interesting to note that, skilled vocational diploma qualifications were mostly held by males.
Looking in details, vocational diploma qualification had the dominant percentage of male holders of about 75% as opposed to 25% of female holders. The highest educational level of master's degree shows the male holders had a distinctive proportion than that of female holders (60% and 40% respectively). Similarly, postgraduate diploma also had the similar trend where the percentage of qualifications for male was higher (about 55%) than that of females (about 48%).
In terms of undergraduate diploma, the proportion of male qualifications decreased substantially. Female showed the dominant proportion of qualification of undergraduate diploma of about 65% compared to approximately 35% of males. Furthermore, bachelor's degree had the similar trend where about 52% of female had this qualification whereas 48% of male held of such a qualification.
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibilities of governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 67
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- The figure below shows the period life expectancy at birth, UK, 1981 to 2064. 73
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in two European countries since 2000 and predicted unemployment rates until 2020. 67
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 73
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'furthermore', 'if', 'look', 'similarly', 'so', 'whereas']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.28078817734 0.268076937826 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.118226600985 0.116061578633 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.118226600985 0.0759168565197 156% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0541871921182 0.0366838410393 148% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00492610837438 0.0131127313244 38% => OK
Prepositions: 0.167487684729 0.155750635184 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0295566502463 0.0379272487307 78% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.47001898648 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0147783251232 0.0210936926555 70% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0886699507389 0.0948980150116 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00985221674877 0.00967000014798 102% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1178.0 1161.00487805 101% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.9 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.69318181818 5.90752243213 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73763899035 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.426136363636 0.337110787985 126% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.357954545455 0.247514529752 145% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.244318181818 0.171178102325 143% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.204545454545 0.112407865282 182% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.47001898648 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.546246751206 96% => OK
Word variations: 43.7461259465 49.3433353143 89% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.5555555556 23.0094962315 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7346410755 42.9750493124 58% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.888888889 135.714022679 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 23.0094962315 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 0.689975730869 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 55.351010101 47.7609492067 116% => OK
Elegance: 2.69444444444 2.94281807926 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.492481010829 0.418131533498 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.198874818898 0.181151798455 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.102171198218 0.0850326197045 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.727783881577 0.706616315825 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.121972679546 0.157042692854 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.275895417189 0.228904883108 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152362072913 0.108899403657 140% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.408972819969 0.367819155151 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.164241620813 0.0812612215331 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.385614790016 0.316326947829 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148557411687 0.0921553760075 161% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.08536585366 147% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.02926829268 198% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.