The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualification in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held the in 1999.
The graph given compares the proportion of five difference degree which was held by both sexes in Australia in 1999. Overall, it can be seen that undergraduate diploma and bachelor degree were among the top list of females holding-degree, meanwhile, diploma, postgraduate diploma, and master degree were shared the highest proportion of holding-degree by males.
Generally, there was a significant difference between qualifications which was had by men and women in the reported year. Males ranked first on the skilled vocational diploma (90%), in contrast, females hold one-ten portion of its degree. However, both sexes shared similar percentages on undergraduate and postgraduate diploma, which is 70% each. Moreover, males and females had the lowest percentages on undergraduate diploma and skilled vocational diploma qualifications, the former was 10% and the latter 36%.
In addition, among the five post-school qualifications shown, it is evident that males outnumbered female, except for Bachelor’s degree which is females share the larger number than males, (54% and 45% respectively).
- The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Task 2: Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003. 84
- The tables below give the information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, while, except for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76073619632 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30035121087 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588957055215 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6629579534 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.142857143 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126350398798 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670869336804 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796153561014 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839382699413 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201961693041 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 61.2550243902 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.4140731707 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.