The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.

The chart gives information about the different levels of post-school qualifications in AUS based on men and women in 1999.
Looking from an overall perspective, the proportion of females who kept undergraduate diplomas and bachelor's degrees was higher than that of males, with an exception for the other categories.
As the chart portrays, men were predominated in percentage in terms of the skilled vocational diploma when it occupied more than 90%, left women to just a tenth. On the other hand, the proportion of undergraduate diplomas and bachelor's degrees was higher in females. To be precise, 70% of the former were completed by women, while this ratio in the latter was more than 50%.
It is noticing that the figure of men pursues higher education after graduated was outnumbered their female counterparts. The quote for this thesis is that the percentage of males who possessed a postgraduate diploma was double that of females, which contributed to 70%. In addition, men got a somewhat more achievement when it comes to master's degree owing to keeping 60%, 40% remaining were women.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-12 alpha2006sh view
2023-10-12 alpha2006sh 90 view
2022-09-19 Efuli 61 view
2022-07-26 Gulmiraa 78 view
2022-03-14 roopdeep view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 337, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'master'.
Suggestion: master
...ewhat more achievement when it comes to masters degree owing to keeping 60%, 40% remain...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12849162011 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96099926027 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.644789292 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211757550031 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989841584249 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127982511742 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164405310432 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156047326582 0.0819641961636 190% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.