The bar chart compares six different regions, namely developed countries, Latin America/ Caribbean, East Asia/ Oceania, Sub-Saharan Africa, Arab states and South Asia in term of rates of illiteracy in 2000, dividing into males and females
As can be seen from the chart, the percentage of illiteracy in women was much higher than men, while the majority of illiteracy rates have more popular in south Asia over the period shown.
There was rarely unlettered in developed countries in both genders from approximately 1% to 2%. The trend was true stability at 10% in Latin America/ Caribbean countries.
In contrast, the figure of analphabetic in female was higher, compared to male increased significantly to approximately 20% at the other four countries: East Asia/ Oceania, Sub-Saharan Africa, Arab states and South Asia. The percentage of illiteracy in South Asia went up to reach at over 30%, roughly 50% which broken down male and female respectively.
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think that this is a positive or negative development? 67
- The table below shows show the number of cars made in Argentina, Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009. 78
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 56
- The chart shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. 11
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28104575163 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86857376606 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62091503268 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 129.142402022 43.030603864 300% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 161.6 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0575041635761 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324560464842 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0139443151286 0.0843802449381 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0395030649316 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00977009970681 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.