The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010.
The bar chart illustrates the consumption of goods, including: cars, computers, books, perfume and cameras in two countries (France and the UK) in 2010.
Overall, both countries spent the most money on cars, whereas the least money the UK and France has spent is on perfume. It is also noticeable that the expenditure of the UK is generally higher than France in the period given.
In terms of cars, the British expenditure is over 450,000 pounds comparing to approximately 400,000 pounds that of France. Similarly, people in the UK spent more than 40,000 pounds on books as opposed to the French at 300,000 pounds. In the UK, the consumption of cameras (just over 35,000 pounds) was over double that of France, which was only 150,000 pounds.
On the other hand, the amount of money paid out on the remaining goods was higher in France. Above 350,000 pounds was spent by the French on computers which was slightly more than the British who spent exactly 350,000 pounds. Neither of the countries spent much on perfume which accounted for 200,000 pounds of expenditure in France but under 150,000 pounds in the UK.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The line chart shows the percentage of people living in Australia born in Asia UK and other regions 78
- Some people think that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- In some countries more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 73
- The plans show changes to the layout of a theatre between 2010 and 2012 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, similarly, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86315789474 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48142127087 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489473684211 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.0778898283 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100278007034 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527619346425 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059751980718 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866609654685 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702823118791 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.