The give bar chart shows data about attendances per-1000 population for December 2016 and December 2017 for 6 different age groups( under 5, 5-15,16-44, 45-54, 55-74,75 and over). Blue bar shows number of attendances in December 2016 and green December 2017.
Overall, attendances in December 2017 remained high than December 2016, for first and last age group number of attendances peaked in both years. For other four age groups attendances almost same.
For age group under five, multitude of attendances in December 2017 was approximately 57, which is slightly more than December 2016. Thus, this trend observed throughout all age groups. Firstly, attendances decreased for age group 5-15 and then slightly increase for age group 16-44.
Attendance of age group 65-74 was 25 and26 and for December 2016 and December 2017 respectively. However, the number of attendances for age group 75 and over rose dramatically to 63 and 65 for December 2016 and December 2017 respectively. This age group have maximum number of attendances for both years.
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 73
- The chart below shows figures for attendances at hospital emergency care departments in Northern Ireland by age group in December 2016 and December 2017 73
- The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication by many However there are some who would argue that it is actually destroying our communication skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The chart below show information about consumer decision regarding mobile phone purchases in two different countries 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other four age groups attendances almost same. For age group under five, mult...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32335329341 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77328914912 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502994011976 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1097312081 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490284422532 0.215688989381 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.268580561018 0.103423049105 260% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105105455649 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.375674651488 0.15604864568 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036139939599 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.32 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.