The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
The bar chart illustrates the number of mobile phones sold worldwide by five manufacturers in the year 2009, 2011 and 2013.
Overall, Nokia sold the most mobile phones between 2009 and 2011. However, Samsung supplanted Nokia to become the best selling brand in 2013. Samsung and Apple saw the largest growth in sales over the 5-year period.
In 2009, the mobile phone sales of Nokia was almost 450 million units, nearly twice of Samsung. Over the next 4 years, Nokia's sales figures declined by 200 million, whereas that of Samsung witnessed a rise by a similar amount. By 2013, Samsung led the top ranked with approximately 450 million units.
The other three mobile phone brands were Apple, LG and ZTE. Starting from only 20 million devices sold in 2009, the mobile phone sales of Apple climbed up rapidly to 150 million in 2013, surpassing that of both LG and ZTE. Meanwhile, the figures for LG saw a considerable drop and for ZTE rose only a bit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | Qanh03 | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | nghiemngoc2912 | 73 | view |
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The pie charts below show the different reasons for flight delays in a particular Asian country in 2015 and 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- In many countries major cities have become too big and overcrowded Why is it happening Give the solution to this problem 63
- when choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration. 73
- Some people think that it is best to live in a vertical city meaning that people work and live in high buildings while others think a horizontal city is better Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74096385542 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32914502202 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9595056282 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.7 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323820924451 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132081558325 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862159088445 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206576470168 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533303291556 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.