The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the percentage of people in the USA who spent how many times eating fast food in their life from 2003 or 2013.
Overall, the proportion of people who ate fast food decreased over the period shown in each of features (excepted the one or twice a month category). Noticeably, eating fast food everyday contained the lowest percentage of people in the USA, while people enjoyed fast food meal once a week has the highest figure.
In 2003, the proportion of people who went to fast food restaurants everyday was about 4%. The figure for several times a week and once a week were higher, at around 17% and 30% respectively. With 3% of people ate fast food everyday in 2006, compared to 20% of several times a week and 33% of once a week. A similar pattern could be found in 2013 although the rates among these categories more significantly.
The percentage of people who ate fast food throughout three different categories namely once or twice a month, a few times a year and never that felt in the period between 2003 and 2013. The figure for once or twice a month was 30%, compared with 13% of a few times a year and 5% of never. This is also case for these categories in 2006 and 2013 which show lower figures.
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it is positive while others think it is a negative development Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 84
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...eople who went to fast food restaurants everyday was about 4%. The figure for several ti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...ith 13% of a few times a year and 5% of never. This is also case for these categories...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45575221239 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40700237382 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5455066023 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.7 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249317931518 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111026210451 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792663229866 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174901082324 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045879365704 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.