The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar graph depicts the information about American people who often ate fast food at restaurants in the year between 2003 and 2013.
Overall, it can be observed from the diagram that almost one-third of Americans went to eat fast food at least once a week or one to two times a month over a decade. However, there were also under 5% of people who either visited every day or never went to a fast-food restaurant in 10 years.
Looking closely at the figures for years 2003 and 2006, it can be obtained that a significant majority over 30% of people went at least once a week to eat fast food. In addition, people who had the habit of eating once or twice a month was nearly one-third. About those who visited several times a week were in between 15% to 20% and all were under 15% who ate few times a year. Lastly, a small minority of less than 5% either never visited or went every day to eat fast food at a restaurant.
Conversely, considering 2013, the trend was similar for daily visitors or who never visited and it was below 5%. Although the rest of frequencies that is several times a week, once a week, few times a year also experienced the similar trend as of 2003 and 2006, it can be clearly seen that the change was in 33% percent of the people of USA went to once or twice a month to eat fast food in 2013 which is the same percentage of Americans who went once a week in 2006.
- Some people think that handwriting is no longer useful in moder world and should not be taught in school To what extent do you agree with this 73
- Many countries spend much money in developing tourism industry Tourism is often considered as a promising industry that supports economic development However some people think that it destroys natural surroundings and traditions Which do you agree with 84
- hasnain 11
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 67
- Do you think cardless society is realistic and why What are the advantages and disadvantages 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, however, if, lastly, look, so, third, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.25939849624 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3046094007 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454887218045 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6003342924 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.888888889 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5555555556 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225953215885 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11372909053 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874827322256 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185368673469 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897597891311 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.02 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.