Some think increasing business and cultural contact between nations is positive. Others think it leads to the disappearance of the national identity. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
It is universally accepted that tourism brings people closer and gives them a chance to learn something new. Many claim that formal or informal tours between countries is worth considering because they provide benefits to tourists. However, few think that it also diminishes the element of patriotism in the travelers. In this essay, I will argue that while traveling is certainly significant, it also shrinks one's national value.
To commence with the significance, exploring countries for business purposes plays a vital role for a country. It brings economic development to the nation which also helps in increasing the number of jobs as well as trade factor of import and export of goods. In addition, many travelers also get a chance to learn about the new culture and traditions of a specific country which usually makes them enthusiastic about it. Evidently, numerous Chinese are these days traveling to Pakistan for jobs following a business trade of CPEC between two nations, and they have been seen practicing Muslim festivals such as Eid and Shab e Barat.
On the contrary, few argue that connection between countries also causes travelers to lose the value of patriotism in them. They often forget their own national and cultural values while they are in other countries. Perhaps, they start practicing local traditions and participate in their gala. For instance, the Chinese in Pakistan, often wear Shalwar Kameez just to be like a Pakistani, despite the fact, they had never worn these clothes in their own country.
My opinion contradicts those who believe talk and trades among nations diminish patriotism in travelers. I strongly believe that it is quite significant for both countries considering economic development and chance to learn about new traditions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-29 | emjhie | 42 | view |
| 2021-12-22 | johntoanpro | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-19 | vanditaverma.v@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-19 | johntoanpro | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | Hasnain | 78 | view |
- Many countries spend much money in developing tourism industry Tourism is often considered as a promising industry that supports economic development However some people think that it destroys natural surroundings and traditions Which do you agree with 84
- Belching and unauthorised behaviour is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification
- Which should require more financial support from the government Health or education To what extent do you agree or not Use your experience 77
- Some think increasing business and cultural contact between nations is positive Others think it leads to the disappearance of the national identity Discuss both views and state your opinion 78
- Many countries spend much money in developing tourism industry Tourism is often considered as a promising industry that supports economic development However some people think that it destroys natural surroundings and traditions Which do you agree with 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun claim seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many claims'.
Suggestion: Many claims
...s them a chance to learn something new. Many claim that formal or informal tours between c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28070175439 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75853749039 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59298245614 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1808737463 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125905985063 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433211779758 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364511689232 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756884037109 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00829624210944 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.