The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013

the column chart illustrates the frequency of dining out in fast food resaurant for American people in the years 2003,2006, and 2013.

Overall, it can be observed from the chart that eating at fast food restaurant once a week and once or twice a month accounted for the highest proportion.

In detail, 17% of Americans eating out several times a week in 2003. However, with a rise to 20% in 2006, the number decreased and reach to 16% by 2013. Similarly, with a rise of about 2% from its initial ratio(31%) the figure for Once a week saw a fall of about 6% by the end of the period. By contrast, the percentage of people who went to restaurant once or twice a month in 2003 which was 30%, experienced a fall of 5% then increase and reach to roughly 33% in 2013.

Furthermore, in 2003, the proportion for individuals who dine out A few times a year stood at almost 12%. Then it increased and leveled off in 2006 at 15%. Conversly, the proportion of individuals who everyday went to restaurant for eat and never went to such places decreased and then leveled out in 2006 both at about 3%.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the column chart illustrates the frequency ...
^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at fast food restaurant once a week and once or twice a month accounted for the ...
^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...rsly, the proportion of individuals who everyday went to restaurant for eat and never we...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, similarly, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44278606965 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59112769353 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517412935323 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8926308097 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167915480344 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749661499124 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780785367447 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130724155952 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789508993941 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.