The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the frequency of eating at junk food restaurants in the United States from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, it is clear that people in the USA habitually ate fast food once a week and once or twice a month, especially in 2006 and 2013, the rate of consumers was the highest. While the percentage of Americans who never ate or ate fast food every day was the least. In 2003, the proportion of Americans who never consumed or consumed fast food every day was around 5%, while from 2003 to 2006, the figure of people who ate fast food was equal, with around 3% eating every day and 4% of those who never ate. Meanwhile, the contribution of people who ate several times a week or a few times a year was only 17% and 13% in 2003. At the end of the period, the figure for people who consumed fast food several times a week declined slightly to 16%, compared to the increased rate of people who ate a few times a year, at 15%.
Looking at other groups, the rate of people who ate at fast food restaurants once a week or a few times a month was the highest, around 31% and 30% respectively. Following 10 years, the percentage of people in the USA who consumed junk food decreased slightly to 27%, while the figure for people who ate a few times a month rose significantly to 35%.
- The charts below give information on the location and types of dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The table and pie chart give information about the population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 56
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 61
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.29098360656 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41121224785 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.405737704918 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.7531750259 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.875 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203410521979 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121063943136 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260254135631 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15994306214 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159789708685 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.