The charts below show the proportion of people’s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1998 and in 2008.
The two pie charts illustrate how much money consumers spent on distinctive goods and services in a European nation from 1998 to 2008.
It is noticeable that clothing and housing is two first-choice purchases for residents in this country in 1998. However, housing accounts for the vast majority of people’s spending commodities in 2008. In addition, with the development of society, the percentage of people’s spending on some commodities increased, the opposite was true for services.
In 1998, housing and clothing accounted for 22% and 32% of total people’s expenditure. By contrast, a mere 8% and 7% of total money spent on food and luxury goods. Moreover, the percentage of transportation and entertainment made up around 13% and 18% respectively.
Over 10 years, such dramatic differences are seen when we compare the figures for housing and clothing. While the rate of total spending on housing increased by 10%, th figure for clothing decreased by 20%. Meanwhile, the same proportion of food and luxury goods (17%) is spent. While the spending on amuesement accounts for 16% of people’s spending, but only 6% of people’s spending on transportation respectively.
- The graph below shows the three different kinds of emission sources oil coal gas of greenhouse gas in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent do you agree disagree 78
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (th) must be used with a third-person verb: 'figures'.
Suggestion: figures
...pending on housing increased by 10%, th figure for clothing decreased by 20%. Meanwhil...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33155080214 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16600122045 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8063574896 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.6363636364 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250592723177 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889640525172 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692756506758 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146132032403 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619701841816 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.