The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart demonstrates what changes five major cities experienced in average house prices in the span of periods: 1990-1995 and 1996-2002, compared with the average home value of 1989. Overall, house buying costs went down considerably in New York, Tokyo, and London between the period of 1990-1996 while it augmented dramatically in London with a gradual increase in New York and Madrid cities during 1996-2002.
A closer look at the graph reveals the fact that average houses purchasing price during 1900-1995 in Tokyo and London decreased by approximately 7% compared with the average price in 1989. However, during the same period, Madrid and Frankfurt experienced a property price rise by about 1% and 1.5% respectively.
Looking at the figures between 1996-2002, the average house price in London went up dramatically, almost 12%, the largest property price hike. Meanwhile, property prices upsurged by 5%, just below 5% and around 1% consecutively in New York, Madrid, and Frankfurt. Interestingly, only London went through 5% decline in the average price of houses over the same period of time.
- Many modern children spend a great deal of time sitting in front of a television or computer screen This is extremely harmful to their development Therefore Parents should strictly limit the time children spend in this way To what extent do you agree or d 85
- In the modern world, many children spend a lot of time in front of computers, televisions, and smartphones. This is very harmful to them.To what extent do you agree? 56
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 89
- The table below shows sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- In the modern world, many children spend a lot of time in front of computers, televisions, and smartphones. This is very harmful to them.To what extent do you agree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e average price of houses over the same period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32386363636 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81166195044 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9823257077 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366523543789 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186148269089 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106315110571 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266532905072 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025789245382 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.