The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe, compared to the EU average, in 2009 and 2010.
The bar chart provided depicts the percentage of fuel used in transport sector in 6 different parts in Europe, compared to the EU average, over a period of 2 years from 2009 to 2010.
Overall, it is evident that the proportion of fuel used in transport sector in Slovakia from 2009 to 2010 was the largest whereas the opposite was true of Greece's.
As can be seen from the bar chart given, the portion of fuel used in transport sector in Slovakia always ranked in the first between 2009 and 2010, compared to the remaining nations and EU average. The figure for Slovakia witnessed a plummet to about 6.5% in 2010, while that of Italy and France slightly rose to almost 5.2% and 4.3%, respectively. There was a plateau of the figure for Austria at merely 5.2% from 2009 to 2010.
As far as the bar chart is concerned, there was a negative correlation between the percentage of fuel used in transport sector in Spain and that of Greece between 2009 and 2010, in which the former minimally decreased to approximately 3% and the latter slightly increased to about 2%. The figure for EU average witnessed a minimal slip from 6% to almost 5% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-13 | Phạm Thanh Tùng | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | Phạm Thanh Tùng | 61 | view |
- Some people think that the government should provide free education at every level However some says that individuals should pay for their university education Discuss both the views and give your opinion 89
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 59
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 67
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 84
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer s total sales in North America South America Europe and Asia 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57281553398 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51703593221 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470873786408 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.7558874527 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.571428571 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4285714286 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391119054832 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194481830125 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100195407692 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270987648479 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598765441361 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.