The bar chart compares the proportion of transport fuel that used in 6 EU countries when compared to the average in 2009 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of fuel used in EU decreased in this period shown. Slovakia was a country that used fuel the highest in group and Greece was lowest in both of years.
In 2009, the percentage of average fuel used in EU group was 6/10. There was nearly 1.5 times the avegare number about demanding of fuel for stranport in Slovakia while the number of Greece was 1/6 of average. The figures of Italy and Australia were over 4,5/10 and 5/10 respectively when comparison with average. On the other hand, the percentage of France and Spain were similar with under 4/10.
The number of people used fuel in transport sector went down 5/10 in 2009 in EU avegare. It was only Slovakia and Spain also reduced but this number for Slovakia was still higher the average about 1.5 units. The demanding of fuel of Australian was still stable while the percentage of the remaining three countries grown up 1 unit for each country.
- Many young people today know more about international pop and movie stars than about famous people in the history of their country Why is this What can be done to increase young people s interest in famous people in the history of their country 73
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 56
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62827225131 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35129252099 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497382198953 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3370088548 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.4 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298202955556 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146783544826 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152693301885 0.0843802449381 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246179700413 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15962212325 0.0819641961636 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.