the chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of schools education.
The given bar chart illustrates the proportion of female students per 100 male students in primary, secondary and tertiary education.
Overall, it is evident that more boy students than girl ones enrolled in primary education and secondary education, while in tertiary education girls in developed countries is the majority of students entering.
Turning to the detail, in primary education and secondary education, the proportion of girls per 100 boys in developing countries is just under 90% smaller than in developed countries. Similar to developing countries, in developed countries the quantity of female students per 100 male ones in 1990 is not many as in 1998. Especially, in secondary education, in developing countries, the number of girls per 100 boys in 1990 is the lowest rate, with 72%.
According to the bar chart, tertiary education in developing countries produces considerably less the quantity of the female students per male students than other levels of school education, with 66% in 1990. As opposed to tertiary education in developing countries, in developed countries tertiary education produces the largest proportion of girls per 100 boys, with 112 in 1998.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-18 | Vuong Linh | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that population explosion is not a serious problem because the world has enough resources to support this issue. 78
- some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries bring many positive developments. Others say it causes the loss of national identities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- what are disadvantages and advantages of having older people living in the family home 73
- Traffic and housing problems should be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree 54
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46486486486 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91684611087 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.410810810811 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0509797997 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.428571429 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260741650916 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155729226396 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608019817991 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174555231031 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296551111626 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 61.2550243902 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.4329268293 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.