The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart describes the number of girls per 100 boys who took admission into various levels of education such as primary, secondary and tertiary education in developing and developed counties. The bar graph data was from the year 1990 and 1998.
In the developing countries, the enrollment for the girls per 100 boys was less than the developed counties for all the levels of school education. But the numbers of girls had been increased in 1998 as compared to 1990 despite hadn’t reached the target of 100. In primary education, the numbers are high as compared to other levels of education such as in 1990 it was 83 and 1998 had increased to 87. Whereas the secondary education had 72 and 82 numbers of girls enrolled in 1990 and 1998 respectively. For tertiary education, the numbers were the lowest such as 66 in 1990 and 75 in 1998.
On contrary, in the developed nations, the numbers had exceeded the target of 100 in tertiary education with numbers of enrolled girls was 105 and 112 in 1990 and 1998 respectively. Whereas, the fewer numbers of girls were involved in primary education with 95 for 1990 and 96 for 1998. Moreover, In secondary education, the number of girls who took admission was 98 for the year 1990 and 99 for the year 1998.
In conclusion, it could be seen clearly that the numbers of girls per 100 boys enrolled at different levels had continuously increased in both the years 1990 and 1998 for developing and developed nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2022-04-05 | Geegeepay | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-05 | Geegeepay | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people say that the education system is the only critical factor in the development of a country To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The graph on the right side describes the rainfall statistics for some country Write a report for a university tutor describing the information shown 67
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 89
- An increasing number of people are buying what they need online what are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping online 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, whereas, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72265625 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6263685746 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.390625 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4117980811 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.909090909 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222279739086 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113464883604 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689315347604 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174826141704 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248760851839 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.