The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given chart has illustrated how many girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education.

It can be seemed that the number of girls enrolled in all three levels of school education had increased overtime. We can also see that the figure for developed countries had always been higher than those for developing countries.

First, for girls lived in developing countries, the chart for those who studied at primary school level witnessed a slight increase, while the figures for those studied in higher levels witnessed a significant rise. However, there is no doubt that those charts hadn't reached the target in all three levels. Morever, the higher the levels were, the lower the porpotion between girls and boys became.

Last but not least, for girls lived in developed countries, the charts for those enrolled in primary and secondary education levels saw a slight increase, while the figure for those enrolled in tertiary education level witnessed a significant rise. By the year of 1998, the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in primary and secondary education levels had been very close to the target of 100 girls, while the figure for those studied in tertiary level had overreached the target by 12 girls. What is more, that the porpotion between girls and boys have been higher and higher as the education level began to climb.

In the conclusion, the porpotion for those lived in developing countries were low and depressing, while those in developed countries were high and positive.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-19 Lamdao1506 view
2023-07-19 Lamdao1506 view
2023-07-19 Lamdao1506 view
2022-04-05 Geegeepay 56 view
2022-04-05 Geegeepay 56 view
Essays by user namphong020 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...er, there is no doubt that those charts hadnt reached the target in all three levels....
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, no doubt, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0753968254 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49042952701 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.420634920635 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.0 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1223308066 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.9 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22688893041 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124578005823 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100333915429 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161662651906 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116113919952 0.0819641961636 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.