The chart below shows the number of international applicants from four countries that a European university had from 2004 to 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates how many overseas students from four dictict nations applied for admission in a European university over a four-year period, strating from 2004.
One noticeable feature in the data is that there was an increase in the number of Japanese, American and Russian pupils applying for a European university, whereas American pupils showed the most dramatic rise being seen in the latter, making it the highest number of international students by the end of the period. In contrast, China experienced a decrease in the number of overseas stundents over the given timeframe.
Looking at the chart in more detail, in 2004, among the four countries, the number of Japanes and Russian students studying at a European university were the lowest partners, with negligible figures of 5000 and 1000 students, respectively. The figure for Japan steadily rose to 10000 students in 2008. In comparison, the number of Russian students learning at European university sharply increased to 8000 students in 2007, after which this figure decreased significantly to 3000 students at the end of the period.
With regard to the remaining countries, in the first year, China had the highest number of students applying to a European university, with 27000 students, compared to the USA, only 20000 students. In the following years, the figure for China fell dramatically to 15000 in 2008, while the number of American students studying at European university underwent an upward fluctuation throughout the period, surpassing the figure for China and become the highest one at the end of the period, reaching around 27000 students.
- The charts below show the comparison of time spent in minutes per day by UK s Males and Females on household and leisure activities in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of self employed workers of the total workforce in five countries in 1998 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- The graphs below show the percentage of math graduates and all graduates who got full time jobs after graduating from a university in Australia and also show the average salary of both these types of grads from 2004 to 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, whereas, while, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28352490421 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80413182069 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494252873563 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.0490412497 43.030603864 200% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.375 112.824112599 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.625 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194924505484 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917422775088 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602957698797 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135675351007 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553865761102 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.