The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.
The figure elucidates the amount of males and females in higher education in Britain in between 1970 and 1990 for studying full-time and part-time. At first glance, it is evident that in comparison with males, females experienced an enormous upsurge for both aspects.
To begin with males, the total of men in full-time education experienced a gradual growth between 1970, which made up approximately at a half of 200, and 1990, which constituted at just above two times of 100. In contrast, there was a dramatic drop for the number of part-time education for me where it, initially, stood at 1000 and plunged to well beyond four-fifths of 1000 in 1980. Erratically, it uplifted considerably, soaring to well under 1000 in 1990.
In accordance with females, 1970 to 1990 witnessed tremendous progress in both educations for females. At first, it upright positioned at just below 800 for part-time education and well less than a half of 400 and peaked roughly to 1100 and just across two-thirds of 300 by the end of the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Piya Bera | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | Nihad | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Shivam7090 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | azizkhon | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | phamngocduyen | 67 | view |
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. Others, however, believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefi 78
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. Why are these changes happening? Do you think these changes are positive and negative? 56
- People live longer today ,and therefore they should work longer? to what extent do you agree or disagree?? 67
- The maps : summarise the changes to Liverpool john moores university from 2010 to 2016. 67
- The two maps illustrate changes that have taken place in an area from 1995 to the present 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, third, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93714285714 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81520072145 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9215585106 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.428571429 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22446229636 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104054166669 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973374282208 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162021370012 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274513896757 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.